WindowCost
Guide

Part L 2022 Window U-Values: 1.4 for New Builds and 1.6 for Replacements

Dan Richardson
Whites of Kent a store with an interesting history.

On 15 June 2022, Part L tightened the new-build window target from 1.6 to 1.4 W/m²K. That 0.2-point move knocked the cheapest double-glazed units off the compliant market overnight.

For replacement windows in existing homes, the headline number stayed at 1.6 — but the method of demonstrating compliance changed. The practical effect is stricter than it reads.

We pulled the full DCLG EPC dataset (23.1 million certificates) and found pre-2002 double glazing returns an average 1.77-band uplift when modelled against potential rating, versus 1.50 for post-2002 double. Replace pre-Part-L-2002 sealed units and the SAP gain is real. Replace a Part L 2022-compliant unit with another Part L 2022-compliant unit and the marginal gain is small. See EPC band uplift by glazing type for the breakdown.

The two targets you need to understand

Part L sets different U-value targets depending on whether the work is a new dwelling or a replacement in an existing dwelling.

New dwellings (Part L Volume 1, 2022 edition)

ElementTarget U-value (W/m²K)Notional dwelling valueLimiting fabric value
Windows1.41.21.6
Rooflights1.41.21.6
Doors (glazed >50%)1.41.21.6
Doors (glazed ≤50%)1.41.01.6

The “target” is the value your actual building must achieve on average. The “notional dwelling” value is what you would need to specify if you were building to a notional specification (used in SAP calculations). The “limiting fabric value” is the absolute maximum any individual element can achieve — you cannot install a window with a U-value of 1.7 even if your overall building performs better than the target.

Existing dwellings (Part L Volume 1, replacement windows)

For replacement windows in existing homes, the situation is more nuanced. The regulation states:

  • Where the existing window has a U-value worse than 1.6 W/m²K, the replacement must achieve a U-value of 1.6 W/m²K or better
  • Where the existing window already meets 1.6 W/m²K or better, the replacement must not worsen the U-value — it must meet or exceed the existing performance

In practice, this means most pre-2002 windows (which are typically 2.8-5.8 W/m²K single or early double glazing) trigger the 1.6 W/m²K requirement. But a 2010-era A-rated window that is being replaced due to damage must be replaced with a window that achieves at least the same U-value.

What U-value means for windows

A U-value measures the rate of heat transfer through a building element. For windows, there are two measurements:

  1. U-value of the glass only (Ug): The centre-pane thermal performance, ignoring the frame
  2. U-value of the whole window (Uw): The combined performance of glass, frame, and spacer — this is what Part L refers to

The frame matters. A 4-16-4 argon-filled unit with a low-E coating achieves a Ug of approximately 1.0 W/m²K in isolation, but when installed in a basic aluminium frame with an aluminium spacer, the whole-window Uw can be 1.6 W/m²K. The same unit in a thermally broken timber frame with a warm-edge spacer can achieve Uw of 1.2 W/m²K or better.

What specifications achieve 1.4 W/m²K

The new 1.4 target for new builds requires a more deliberate specification than the old 1.6. Here are the glazing configurations that reliably achieve 1.4 W/m²K on a whole-window basis:

uPVC frames

ConfigurationUgUw (typical)
4-16-4 argon, low-E, warm-edge1.01.2-1.4
4-20-4 argon, low-E, warm-edge0.91.1-1.3
4-16-4 argon, low-E, aluminium spacer1.01.4-1.6 (borderline)
4-16-4 krypton, low-E, any spacer0.81.1-1.3

The critical variable is the spacer. An aluminium spacer adds 0.2-0.4 W/m²K to the whole-window U-value compared to a warm-edge spacer. With the 1.4 target, an aluminium spacer is still possible but leaves no margin — if the frame is slightly wider or the glass is a non-standard size, you may miss compliance.

Aluminium frames

ConfigurationUgUw (typical)
4-16-4 argon, low-E, warm-edge, thermal break1.01.3-1.5
4-20-4 argon, low-E, warm-edge, thermal break0.91.2-1.4
4-18-4 argon, low-E, warm-edge, deep thermal break1.01.2-1.3

Aluminium frames need a wider thermal break to achieve 1.4. Entry-level aluminium systems with a 24mm polyamide break may not meet 1.4 on their own; premium systems (Smart Systems Alitherm 600, Reynaers CF 77) with 32-34mm breaks will.

Timber frames

ConfigurationUgUw (typical)
4-16-4 argon, low-E, warm-edge1.01.0-1.3
4-20-4 argon, low-E, warm-edge0.90.9-1.2

Timber is the best-performing frame material. Even a basic 4-16-4 specification in a timber frame with a warm-edge spacer will comfortably beat 1.4. This is why heritage and conservation-area replacements using slim-profile double glazing in existing timber frames can sometimes still achieve Part L compliance.

What specifications achieve 1.6 W/m²K (replacement standard)

The 1.6 target for replacements is easier to achieve. Almost any double-glazed unit manufactured after 2002 with argon fill and a low-E coating will meet 1.6 in a uPVC or timber frame. Even aluminium frames with basic thermal breaks achieve 1.6 with a 4-16-4 unit and an aluminium spacer.

The only windows that will not meet 1.6 are:

  • Single glazing (5.8 W/m²K)
  • Early double glazing with no low-E coating and no gas fill (2.8-3.2 W/m²K)
  • Double glazing with failed seals (condensation between panes indicates the gas fill is lost)

The WER alternative

Part L allows you to demonstrate compliance through Window Energy Rating (WER) instead of U-value, as administered by the British Fenestration Rating Council. The WER system rates windows from A++ to E. For Part L 2022:

  • New builds: Minimum WER B (or U-value 1.4)
  • Replacements: Minimum WER B (or U-value 1.6)

The WER route can be easier because it takes into account solar gain (the heat energy that comes through the glass from sunlight). A window with a U-value of 1.5 but high solar gain could achieve a WER of B, satisfying Part L even though the U-value alone would not meet 1.4. See our argon vs krypton gas fill guide for how gas fills affect both U-value and WER.

Triple glazing and the path to 0.8 W/m²K

Part L does not require triple glazing. The 1.4 target is achievable with double glazing in all frame materials. However, if you are building to Passivhaus or aiming for an EPC A rating, you will need:

ConfigurationWhole-window Uw
4-16-4-16-4 triple, argon, low-E, warm-edge, timber frame0.7-0.9
4-16-4-16-4 triple, argon, low-E, warm-edge, uPVC frame0.8-1.0
4-16-4-16-4 triple, krypton, low-E, warm-edge, any frame0.6-0.8

Triple glazing adds 20-40% to the window unit cost. For a standard 1200×1000mm casement, that means an additional £150-£300 per unit over a compliant double-glazed specification. See our double vs triple glazing guide for the comfort and acoustic trade-offs.

Air permeability and the whole-house test

Part L 2022 introduced a tighter air permeability target for new builds: 5 m³/(h·m²) at 50 Pa, down from the previous default of 10. This matters for windows because the installation quality directly affects the air test result. A PAS 24 door with poorly sealed frame fixings will leak air and can cause the whole house to fail the air test — even if the windows themselves meet the U-value target.

The practical implication: specify that your installer uses expanding foam tape (not just silicone) around all window and door frames, and insist on a pre-test check if you are within 10% of the air permeability limit.

The Future Homes Standard (2025)

The government has confirmed that the Future Homes Standard, expected to come into force in 2025, will require a further U-value reduction. The proposed target for windows is 0.8 W/m²K for new builds — effectively mandating triple glazing as standard. The replacement window standard is expected to remain at 1.6 W/m²K.

If you are specifying windows for a new build that will be completed after 2025, consider triple glazing now to avoid a costly retrofit.

Summary

  • New-build windows: 1.4 W/m²K (Part L 2022) — achievable with double glazing and warm-edge spacers
  • Replacement windows: 1.6 W/m²K — almost any modern double glazing meets this
  • The spacer bar matters more than most homeowners realise — aluminium spacers add 0.2-0.4 W/m²K
  • WER B is an alternative route to demonstrating compliance
  • Triple glazing is not required by Part L but will be needed for the Future Homes Standard (0.8 W/m²K)
  • Installation quality affects air permeability — a poorly sealed frame can fail the whole-house air test

Back to all cost guides or home.

EPC glazing-uplift evidence base

Analysis of 23.1 million Energy Performance Certificates across England & Wales, showing how current glazing type relates to modelled energy improvement potential.

Glazing type prevalence across UK housing stock

Single glazing appears in just 0.06% of EPC records — likely an undercount since the least-efficient homes may be the least likely to have a current certificate on file. Secondary glazing (0.53%) and triple glazing (0.18%) remain rare.

Not recorded
9.0M 38.8%
Double glazing (vintage unknown)
6.2M 27.0%
Double glazing (post-2002)
4.6M 20.0%
Double glazing (pre-2002)
2.3M 10.0%
Other / unknown type
797.6K 3.4%
Secondary glazing
122.2K 0.5%
Triple glazing
42.3K 0.2%
Single glazing
12.8K 0.1%

Average EPC band uplift by current glazing type

How many EPC bands (A-G) the typical home moves from current to modelled potential rating. Higher means more headroom for improvement — not that the glazing type is thermally superior. Secondary glazing tops the list because it's fitted to period properties with other upgrade headroom. Triple glazing sits lowest because it's in already-efficient homes.

Secondary glazing
1.93 n=100.5K
Other / unknown type
1.93 n=687.9K
Double glazing (pre-2002)
1.77 n=1.9M
Double glazing (vintage unknown)
1.68 n=5.2M
Single glazing
1.68 n=10.2K
Not recorded
1.58 n=6.1M
Double glazing (post-2002)
1.50 n=3.5M
Triple glazing
1.44 n=27.2K

Current → Potential EPC band movement

75.8% of UK homes would improve at least one EPC band if all recommended measures were applied. The most common transitions are shown below.

D → B
4.8M 20.5%
C → B
4.2M 18.2%
D → C
3.3M 14.4%
C → C
3.3M 14.2%
B → B
1.7M 7.5%
E → C
1.4M 6.1%
B → A
1.2M 5.2%
E → B
1.1M 4.7%
D → D
371.7K 1.6%
E → D
296.2K 1.3%

EPC domestic dataset, aggregated 2026-04-24. Licensed under Open Government Licence v3 (OGL v3) — non-address fields only. Read the full analysis →